How to Recognize Alcohol & Drug Addiction : The Effects of Withdrawal From Addiction
Thursday, April 8th, 2010 at
2:15 am
Learn about the effects of withdrawal from addiction in this free home health video. Expert: John depalma Bio: John depalma received a CASAC degree from Queens College and has been counseling drug abusers for over five years. Filmmaker: Buccola Richard
Tagged with: addiction • Alcohol • drug • Effects • from • Recognize • withdrawal
Filed under: VIDEOS on ALCOHOL WITHDRAWAL
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
There is hope for the Hopeless that are struggling with addiction. Reformers Unanimous is a faith-based addictions program. We maintain an 82% percent success rate! Check us out @Ruinternational.
There is hope for the Hopeless that are struggling with addiction. Reformers Unanimous is a faith-based addictions program with and 82% success rate.
Check out our videos @Ruinternational.
There is hope for those who struggle with Addiction. There is a cure for addiction. Check out our Youtube Page. Reformers Unanimous
@broadcastmyass4u
lol But VERY TRUE!
an alcoholic doesn’t wake up in the morning and go to a bar to, “get their fix” as you put it. They have that on deck already
I remember my daddy coming home from rehab every couple of years or so, and he shook and sweat like crazy. It scared me. I was only little; no child should have to see their parent go through something as painful as withdrawal symptoms.
Uhh, that’s not what withdrawals are. You’re saying that withdrawals are merely the time between consuming the substance someone is addicted to. No, withdrawals are a physiological response that effect every organ in the body. Alcohol withdrawals for example: Heart rate spikes, blood pressure spikes, stroke and seizure activity emerges, shakes develop, hallucinations can occur. It’s not just merely the time between usage. No wonder this video has a low rating.
oh god dide they really turn this into another religiuous banter?
If you need help with a loved one or yourself, we have a newly made website. This website will include the following:
*Information about drugs
*Truth about drugs
*What to do
*Stories about people who overcame drug/alcohol addiction
Substancetruth (dot) c0m
Hi Dazed, you say atheists require evidence. I have a challenge for you. Do you believe that your position is more likely to be nearer to or closer to the truth than theism? If you don’t, why then are you an atheist? If you do, then what evidence do you have to support your position that atheism is truer than or at least more likely to be nearer to the truth than theism? A simple question.
I’m bored. I work for a living. Two jobs. Maybe I’ll pick this up again later.
For one, attacking my ID is proof enough that you can’t understand the idea that it is based on the concept of living in an absurd world without drugs. The fact is your ideas are not only wrong based only on evidence, but wrong on ethical grounds too. If you are going to fight, do it with facts and evidence, not with attacks against me. Stick with the argument, and I will too. I think you are intelligent and know better than to attack me as a person, so prove it, or prove me wrong.
Your user ID says more than I ever could. Is that hominenen enough for you? And you’re a bore. You’re like a dog that barks at a car. Car’s gone, dog’s still barking. At what? Don’t know. Don’t care. As for God, there are some drawn to that mystery, I say let them be. Its your aggressive aggrandizement of atheism that scares many religious people away from working toward a world were all beliefs, religious and philosophical, can exist together harmoniously.
Am I on drugs? That would figure to be your argument, your an addiction counselor, anyone who disagrees with you must be on drugs, right? No, addiction is a biological/social issue, not a religious issue. And if you did your homework, you’d realize that you haven’t responded to a single argument, you pull ad hominem claims against me. Note how you attack me, but don’t respond only to the arguments themselves. And “lake of fire” was theoretical, it still represents what you have shown to believe.
Your zeal has made you blind to reasoned debate. I’m not talking about the Bible. One of my past posts clearly states that I don’t believe God lives in any house of worship or the Bible. Do your homework. A simple review would reveal that all I’ve ever claimed is that faith dares the soul to go beyond what the eyes can see. Lake of fire? Are you on drugs?
Circular reasoning, glad you mentioned that: The Bible is correct because it is the word of God. It is the word of God because the Bible says so. Therefore, the Bible is the word of God. That is the definition of intellectual laziness. How can arguments be conformist if most Americans believe in God? If it’s conformist, it can’t be risqué. If it’s risqué, it can’t be conformist. Make up your mind. Furthermore, no athiest believes you will burn in a lake of fire, but you do, and that’s sadistic
Circular reasoning is legitimate due to circular reasoning being legitimate. That’s what I hear.
Anti-religious people are as bad as fundamentalists in their fashionable left wing absolutism.
There is so much intellectual laziness behind what passes for religion bashing today. People who like to attack religion think they’re being risqué. Most of their arguments are just conformist and insipid.
I never claimed to know everything, in fact, that’s the whole point…I don’t. That’s why I require evidence and make judgements based on facts. And Einstein wasn’t a Christian btw, he was a deist. There is a big difference. Furthermore, Hitler professed to be Catholic and even if he lied, his troops who commited the murders themselves were absolutely religious. Stalin was an athiest, but he founded a political system that was religious in nature. Political ideas are often religion in disguise.
I’m not like you. I don’t know everything. I do know however that the greatest scientific geniuses in history were devout Christians—and scientists from Newton to Einstein insisted that biblical religion provided the key ideas from which experimental science could develop. The Crusades, the Inquisition, the Galileo affair, and witch hunts together make up less than 1% of the murders that have occurred during modern atheist regimes like Stalin, Hitler, and Mao.
No ZELIG, an athiest doesn’t believe in magic, a religious person does. We require evidence, you require faith. We can prove things through reasoning, you claim things through wishful thinking. And PLEASE do yourself a favor and read a book on evolution, you created a straw man argument b/c you obviously don’t understand it.
I’m not commenting on your supposed expertise in recovery care/rehabilitation, I’m commenting on your overwhelming ignorance towards the sciences.
How about you stick to what you know and leave recovery from alcohol and drug abuse to those of us in the field. I have reached many a hopeless addict without ever mentioning abiogenesis. When it works, it’s usually through a blend of self care, group therapy and spirituality.
To say that abiogenesis isn’t popular is about as off as one can get. It is currently THE most favored view on the origin of life amongst biologists, biochemists, et al. Please quite spouting disinformation.
You should be aware that Pasteur’s ideas surrounding spontaneous generation aren’t an “absolute” in the same way that Koch’s postulates aren’t an absolute (because Koch, for example, could not have foreseen viruses, and his postulate doesn’t apply to the bacteria that causes syphilis, as an example). It should also be noted that the current biological definition of life is different from the original definition, and will change again.
Furthemore, it seems that as eminent a scientist as Luis Pasteur demostrated that life does not currently spontaneously arise in complex form from nonlife in nature. Abiogenesis is just a theory and not a very popular one outside rabidly ahtiestic circles. Have you considered prayer? You may not find god, but you almost surely will find more serenity, more tolerance, less fear, and less anger. You may acquire a QUIET courage.